How an Insurance Mandate Could Leave Many Worse Off
Written by Written by Rob Lillpopp on October 26, 2009 – 5:38 am

The following is part of an op-ed by Tyler Cowen, a professor of economics at George Mason University that appeared in last weeks New York Times.

“Americans seem to like the idea of broadening health insurance coverage, but they may not want to be forced to buy it. With health care costs high and rising, such government mandates would make many people worse off.

The proposals now before Congress would require just about everyone to buy health insurance or to get it through their employers — which would generally result in lower wages. In other words, millions of people would be compelled to spend lots of money on something they previously did not want, at least not at prevailing prices.

Estimates of this burden vary, but for a family of four it could range up to $14,000 a year over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Right now, many Americans take the gamble of going without insurance, just as many of us take our chances with how much we drive or how little we exercise.”

To read the rest of the op-ed click here.

Posted in  

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

If you don't have an account, please register.