Data Used to Justify Health Savings Can Be Shaky
Written by Written by Rob Lillpopp on June 3, 2010 – 5:06 am

Reed Abelson and Gardiner Harris write in the New York Times how health care reform savings may not be what was promised. - “In selling the health care overhaul to Congress, the Obama administration cited a once obscure research group at Dartmouth College to claim that it could not only cut billions in wasteful health care spending but make people healthier by doing so.

Wasteful spending — perhaps $700 billion a year — “does nothing to improve patient health but subjects you and me to tests and procedures that aren’t necessary and are potentially harmful,” the president’s budget director, Peter Orszag, wrote in a blog post characteristic of the administration’s argument.”

To read more click here.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

If you don't have an account, please register.